Imprès des de Indymedia Barcelona :
Independent Media Center
Dll Dm Dc Dj Dv Ds Dg
      01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

No hi ha accions per a avui

afegeix una acció

Media Centers
This site
made manifest by
dadaIMC software

Envia per correu-e aquest* Article
Notícies :: @rtivisme
Graffiti Gets Philosophical
31 ago 2003
Tuesday, August 26, 2003
In today's Los Angeles Times (where I happen to be this week) there's an interesting commentary by Crispin Sartwell on the relationship between graffiti and advertising:
Defacing ads should be allowed. The medium is the billboard and the message is freedom.
By Crispin Sartwell

"Graffiti and advertising have many things in common. Both convey messages by occupying public space; indeed, both are omnipresent and unavoidable. At the upper reaches of excellence both are arts, though they are more often merely puerile and annoying noise. But there are some key differences.

Advertising is designed to manipulate people, whereas graffiti is essentially a pure mode of self-expression. Advertising is encouraged or courted by the authorities. Graffiti is illegal. And here is the difference that makes sense of all the others: money. All the legitimacy of advertising derives from the money that is paid to post it and the revenue it generates.

On the other hand graffiti is, in every sense, free and hence criminal. In fact, law enforcement is often called on to defend advertisements from graffiti.

Advertising is the public expression of wealthy people and organizations. Graffiti is the public expression of people who are more or less broke. And that is exactly why advertising is authorized and graffiti is eradicated.
Mira també:

Ja no es poden afegir comentaris en aquest article.
Ya no se pueden añadir comentarios a este artículo.
Comments can not be added to this article any more